Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites of the World

Setup during HiTech AlkCarb: an online database of alkaline rock and carbonatite occurrences

Khibina (Khibiny)

stripes

Occurrence number: 
136-12-017
Country: 
Russia
Region: 
Kola and Karelia
Location: 
Longitude: 33.78, Latitude: 67.72
Carbonatite: 
Yes

The Khibina alkaline complex with an area of 1327 km2 is second only to the Guli complex (Meimecha Kotui No 2) in terms of size. It forms an isolated mountain massif between Lake Imandra in the west and Lake Umbozero to the east, the mountains rising above the ancient surrounding peneplain to a height of 700-1000 m. The complex is emplaced into Archaean granite gneisses and Proterozoic volcanic-sedimentary rocks along steep outer contacts, which have been traced to a depth of 7 km by geophysical methods. Adjacent to the outer contacts albite-aegirine fenites and hornfelses are extensively developed. The intrusion has a concentric, zonal structure in which primary igneous layering is very well developed. Galakhov (1975) distinguished several zones in the complex, which correspond to distinct ring and conical intrusions formed as a result of successive phases of intrusion. The earliest intrusions are alkaline and nepheline trachytes and rhomb and nepheline porphyries which form a steeply inclined body 0.5 km in thickness in the western part of the massif and xenoliths in the peripheral zones. The zones of the complex, from the periphery to the centre, are as follows (see Table). (1) alkaline syenite (umptekite) and nepheline syenite (0.3 km thick). (2) and (3) massive and trachytic khibinites (about 5.5km thick). (4) rischorrite (biotite-nepheline syenite) - ijolite - urtite - apatite-nepheline rocks (2-3 km). (5) melteigite, ijolite and urtite. (6) and (7) heterogeneous nepheline syenite and foyaite (3.5-4 km). (8) carbonatite. The khibinites of zone (3) are trachytic and in the deepest parts of the exposed section are stratified in the form of alternating sequences of leucocratic nepheline syenite and melanocratic ijolitic rocks. The rischorrites of zone (4) comprise a complex ring-like intrusive body the rocks of which are characterised by poikilitic textures and the occurrence of dactylotypic and micropegmatitic intergrowths of alkali feldspar and nepheline. Metasomatic proceeses may have played an important role in the generation of these rocks. The melteigite-ijolite-urtite series that comprises the fifth zone develops a striking layered complex within which is the well known apatite-nepheline ore deposit (described below) In the northwestern part of the complex within the khibinites are a high density of xenoliths of peridotite, perovskite clinopyroxenite and ijolite which are similar in composition to the alkaline ultramafic rocks of the Afrikanda and Kovdor complexes. Throughout the intrusion there are alkaline pegmatites and numerous zones of albitization. In the eastern part, near to the bodies of rischorrite and urtite, there is a carbonatite stockwork with a diameter of about 800 m (Fig. 19), which lies at the focus of the multiple layered complex. Drilling has indicated that the carbonatite extends to a depth of at least 1.7 km. The carbonatites are considered to be younger than the principal layered units of the complex and the dykes of tinguaite, alkaline trachyte and alkaline lamprophyres (monchiquite and damkjernite). Dykes are widespread in this part of the complex, where they cut the principal alkaline rocks with the formation of typical eruptive-explosive breccias which have lamprophyric, tinguaitic, orthoclasitic and chalcedonic cements. As well as the dykes in the eastern part of the complex, there are numerous pipes of eruptive breccia that have diameters of 50-100 m and contain fragments which include olivinite, clinopyroxenite, phoscorite, urtite and nepheline syenite set in a matrix which may be tinguaitic or of phlogopite picrite. The carbonatite stock has a complicated structure. Multistage carbonatite breccias are cut by a stockwork of carbonatites which extend through the central part of the stock. Vertical zoning is evident in the stock with in the upper part magnesian varieties of carbonatite and in the lower part aegirine-biotite-calcite carbonatites with apatite. Zones of carbonatisation of the host-rocks, including foyaites and tinguaites, are related to the carbonatites. There are a number of formational stages of differing composition amongst the carbonatites including (1) biotite-, aegirine-biotite- and albite-calcite carbonatites, (2) manganiferous calcite-ankerite and siderite carbonatites and (3) manganiferous siderite and ankerite carbonatites with significant natrolite and dawsonite (Dudkin, 1991). Noteworthy chemical features of the carbonatites are a predominance of Na over K and high contents of Sr, Ba, Mn, F, S and rare earth elements. More than 80 minerals have been identified in the carbonatites, and closely associated rocks, including dawsonite, nahcolite, fluorite, cryolite, synchisite, parisite, burbankite and edingtonite (Dudkin, 1991). The carbonatites have been described in detail by Dudkin et al. (1984) and Dudkin (1991). The mineralogy of Khibina is described in the two volume monograph by Kostyleva-Labuntsova et al. (1978) and a range of unstable and water soluble minerals from the complex is described by Khomyakov (1987). The geological structure of the massif is outlined in the maps and papers of Eliseev et al. (1939) and Zak et al (1972), while Galakhov (1975) has described the petrology of the complex in detail. There is a brief account in Gerasimovsky et al. (1974).

Economic: 
The largest igneous apatite deposit in the world is located in the ijolite-urtite part (zone 5) of the complex (Ivanova, 1963). Eight major apatite ore bodies have been delineated along an arcuate zone some 75 km in length. The apatite-rich rocks have been classified into three groups which are referred to as I 'pre-ore', II 'ore' and III 'post-ore'. The rocks of the first group consist of an ijolite series which is interlayered with subordinate melteigite, urtite, juvite and malignite, the whole having a total thickness of less than 700 m. The second group consists of massive feldspathic urtite, ijolite-urtite and apatite ore with a total thickness of 200-700 m. The units of group III are from 10 to 1400 m thick and include urtite, ijolite, melteigite, juvite, malignite and lujavrite. The principal phosphate-ore deposits are found in group II where the apatite-rich rocks occur in the hanging wall of an ijolite - urtite intrusion. The deposit is both petrographically and geochemically zoned. The upper zone (apatite-rich ore) has been called patchy and patchy-banded ore and consists of 60%-90% euhedral apatite crystals ranging up to several tenths of a millimetre across. Clinopyroxene, titanite, feldspars, titanomagnetite and nepheline occur as intergranular minerals. Monomineralic nepheline layers sometimes alternate with monomineralic apatite layers. The lower zone (apatite-poor-ore) is composed of lenticular-banded, net-like and block-ore. The lenticular-banded ore consists of fine-grained ijolite separated by layers of apatite and fine-grained urtite, whereas the net-like ore is texturally and structurally similar to lenticular-banded ore differing from it only in the scarcity of urtite and apatite bands. The block ore appears to be pegmatitic. Occasional large crystals of nepheline (up to 15 cm across) occur in the nepheline-apatite rock and in the apatite segregations. The lower zone grades down into massive urtite which consists of 75%-90% large euhedral nepheline crystals with intergranular acmitic clinopyroxene, feldspar, titanomagnetite and aenigmatite. Small grains of euhedral apatite are also found in the mesostasis. An apparent late-stage eruptive breccia, containing xenoliths from the lower zone of the apatite ore in an ijolite-urtite matrix, also occurs in the zone. A crystal fractionation model for the apatite deposit is proposed by Khapayev and Kogarko (1987), based on observations of the rock-forming minerals; they give numerous analyses of nepheline, pyroxene, apatite and titanite. Frenkel and Khapayev (1990) consider a convective accumulation model for production of the apatite-rich rocks.The resources have been reported to total 4000 million tonnes averaging 15% P2O5 (Ilyin, 1989) and this is by far the largest source of igneous phosphate in the world. Production began in 1929 and at present there are five mines, with both underground and surface working, but the Central open pit accounts for about half of production; there are three beneficiation plants with an estimated total capacity of 20 million tonnes annually. The flotation concentrate produced is maintained at 39.5% P2O5 with production in 1987 at 20.8 million tonnes (Ilyin, 1989). Nepheline from urtite, ijolite and the apatite ores is also produced and used for the production of aluminium. The carbonatites contain up to 9% REE, 6.5% Sr and 3% Ba (A. Zaitsev and M.J. Le Bas, unpublished data).
Age: 
Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd isochrons on rock-forming minerals and whole rocks gave 365±13 Ma (Kogarko et al., 1981 and 1986). K-Ar on biotite gave 400±12 Ma (Shanin et al., 1967) and on nepheline and lepidomelane from rischorrite 392_+16 and 400 Ma respectively, while nepheline from ijolite gave 386±12 to 410±12 Ma, from foyaite 412±12 and from chibinite 392±12 Ma (Kononova and Shanin, 1971). Five whole rock and mineral Rb-Sr isochrons ranged from 377.3±3.9 to 362.4±4.5 Ma (Kramm et al., 1993).
References: 

*DUDKIN, O.B. 1991. Carbonatite and the sequence of formation of the Khibiny pluton. International Geology Review, 33: 375-84.
DUDKIN, O.B., MINAKOV, F.V., KRAVCHENKO, M.P., KYLAKOV, A.N., POLEZHAIVA, L.E., PRIPACHKIN, V.A., PUSHKAREV, Yu.D. and RUNGENEN, G.E. 1984. Carbonatites of the Khibina. Akademii Nauk SSSR, Kola Branch, Apatity. 98 pp.
ELISEEV, N.A., OZSHINSKY, N.S. and VOLODIN, E.N. 1939. Geological map of the Khibina tundras. Geolupravleniye, Leningrad. 19. 68 pp.
*FRENKEL, M.Y. and KHAPAYEV, V.V. 1989. A convective cumulation model of crystallization differentiation of the melt and formation of the apatite deposits in the Khibiny ijolite-urtite intrusion. Geochemistry International, 27(4): 101-12.
GALAKHOV, A.V. 1975. The petrology of the Khibina alkaline massif. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Kola Branch, Leningrad. 256 pp.
*GERASIMOVSKY, V.I., VOLKOV, V.P., KOGARKO, L.N. and POLYAKOV, A.I. 1974. Kola Peninsula. In H. Sorensen (ed), The alkaline rocks. 206-21. John Wiley, London.
*ILYIN, A.V. 1989. Apatite deposits in the Khibiny and Kovdor alkaline igneous complexes, Kola Peninsula, north-western USSR. In A.J.G. Notholt, R.P. Sheldon and D.F. Davidson (eds), Phosphate deposits of the world. 2. Phosphate rock resources. 485-93. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
IVANOVA, T.N. 1963. Apatite deposits of the Khibina tundras. Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow. 288 pp.
*KHAPAYEV, V.V. and KOGARKO, L.N. 1987. Composition of rock-forming minerals in the Khibiny apatite-bearing intrusion and the origin of the apatite deposits. Geochemistry International, 24(12): 21-32.
*KHOMYAKOV, A.P. 1987. Salt minerals in ultra-agpaitic rocks and the ore potential of alkaline massifs. International Geology Review,29: 1446-56.
*KOGARKO, L.N., KRAMM, U., DUDKIN, O.B. and MINAKOV, F.V. 1986. Age and genesis of carbonatites of the Khibiny alkalic pluton, as inferred from rubidium-strontium isotope data. Transactions (Doklady) of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Earth Science Sections, 289: 196-8.
KOGARKO, L.N., KRAMM, U., BLAXLAND, A., GRAUERT, B. and PETROVA, E.N. 1981. Age and origin of the alkaline rocks of the Khibina massif (Rb and Sr isotopes). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Geochemistry, 260: 1001-4.
*KONONOVA, V.A. and SHANIN, L.L. 1971. On the possible application of nepheline for alkaline rock dating. Bulletin Volcanologique, 35: 1-14.
KOSTYLEVA-LABUNTSOVA, E.E., BORUTSKY, B.E., SOKOLOVA, M.N., SHLUKOVA, Z.V., DORFMAN, M.D., DUDKIN, O.B., KOZYREVA, L.V. and IKORSKY, S.V. 1978. Mineralogy of the Khibina massif. Nauka, Moscow. 2 volumes.
*KRAMM, U., KOGARKO, L.N., KONONOVA, V.A. and VARTIAINEN, H. 1993. The Kola alkaline province of the CIS and Finland: precise Rb-Sr ages define 380-360 Ma age range for all magmatism. Lithos, 30: 33-44.
KUKHARENKO, A.A., BULAKH, A.G., IL'INSKY G.A., SHINKAREV, N.F. and ORLOVA, M.P. 1971. Metallogenic peculiarities of alkaline formations of the eastern part of the Baltic shield. Trudy Leningradskogo Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei, 122 (2): 278 pp.
O'INSKY, I.S. 1935. Lovchorrite-rinkolite deposits of the Khibina external belt. Proceedings of the All-Union Mineralogical Society. Ser 2, 64: 355-415.
SHANIN, L.L., KONONOVA, V.A. and IVANOV, I.B. 1967. On the application of nepheline in K-Ar geochronometry. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologiya, 5: 19-30.
ZAK,S.I.,KAMENEV, E.A. and MINAKOV, F.V.1972.TheKhibina alkaline massif. Nedra, Moscow. 175 pp.

Map: 
Fig. 2_18. Khibina (after Zak et al., 1972, Fig. 2). and Fig. 2_19. Carbonatite centre at eastern end of Khibina complex (after Dudkin et al., 1984, Fig. 2).
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith